Google has just launched Firebase Studio, an AI coding platform in which you just have to provide prompts, and it will create apps and software for you.
That’s cool, and it’s really helpful for the coders.
But, what if you are not a coder? Can it generate a whole app by just giving prompts?
Well, yes, it’s possible now. You can build an app by entering prompts only. For this, you don’t need advanced knowledge of coding. Even no-coders can build apps from these types of tools.
And, this is called VIBE CODING.
Read also,
What is Vibe Coding?
Vibe Coding is in trend these days. When an AI platform can build an app from just a bunch of prompts, it is called Vibe Coding.
For that, you don’t need to have advanced knowledge of coding.
Even a no-coder can build apps with the help of these tools.
That’s how the coding world is changing, and the debate started that Can Vibe Coding Replace Traditional Coders?
Let’s find out.
Vibe Coding vs Traditional Coding
While coding is a modern programming approach, you don’t need to have advanced knowledge of coding to build an app.
With the help of AI tools, we can build apps by providing prompts. These tools take a few seconds to build an app for you.
It’s a natural Language style of development powered by AI tools like GitHub Copilot, Replit Ghostwriter, ChatGPT, and Google’s Firebase Studio.
In which type of development, you just have to provide prompts to these tools, and they will generate code for your app. In some cases, they can build a whole app for you.
On the other hand, in the traditional way of coding, you have to know programming languages, syntaxes, IDEs, and other tools and skills required for coding.
The learning curve of the traditional way of coding is very vast and time-consuming. A professional coder spends years learning to become a professional in this field.
Here’s a quick comparison between both coding styles.
| Feature | Traditional Coding | Vibe Coding |
|---|---|---|
| Syntax Knowledge | Required | Minimal |
| Learning Curve | Takes years of learning | No |
| Speed | Moderate | Fast |
| Customization | High | Limited |
| Best For | Complex systems, full apps | Takes a year of learning |
| Debugging | Manual | MVPs, ideas, and content tools |
Limitations of Vibe Coding
Well, Vibe coding is fast and user-friendly, but it has flaws.
If you are excited to build your first app by this method, STOP and THINK.
There are some serious limitations to keep in mind before you ditch traditional coding entirely.
The lack of deep understanding is one of the biggest downsides of Vibe Coding.
When AI writes the logic for you, you may end up without fully understanding its purpose. It can be risky if you are on a big project.
Vibe coding depends on AI models, and over-reliance on AI models can put you at risk, such as suggesting incorrect or inefficient code, or even generating security vulnerabilities.
Since you are not writing the code line by line, debugging can become harder. And if you are not a coder, you might not understand where the problem lies or how to fix it.
When it comes to building large-scale systems, integrating APIs, managing databases, or writing complex algorithms, AI-based coding starts hitting the wall. For these purposes, you need to be a traditional coder.
How Much Coding Skills Do You Need For Vibe Coding?
Vibe Coding saves you from writing tons of code that could be overwhelming. With Vibe Coding, you don’t need to be a coding expert to get started.
But don’t expect that a no-coder can build a whole flawless app with Vibe Coding. You have to have at least basic knowledge of coding to understand what’s going on.
You don’t need to be a pro coder, but the more you know, the better you’ll vibe.
After all, Basic logic + clear instructions = powerful results with vibe coding.
Can Vibe Coding Replace Traditional Coding?
It’s a big question on every coder’s mind, like mine: Can vibe coding actually replace traditional coding?
AI tools are getting smarter day the day. Someday, they would replace pro coders, BUT not now and upcoming years.
Vibe Coding is a powerful supplement, not a replacement. However, it helps beginners build simple apps, but you may struggle with advanced apps.
In my opinion, AI can’t replace traditional coding in the near future, so the pro-coders are safe.
Related,
